Statistically, the pattern of violence in trans women more closely resembles male patterns of violence- meaning, it is extremely more likely for a trans woman to be violent compared to women. Statistically, trans women are the victims of violence at about the same rate as other males, while violence against females is astronomically more prevalent.
Statistically, the pattern of violence in trans men more closely resembles female patterns of violence than male ones- meaning, it is extremely less likely for a trans man to be violent compared to men. Statistically, trans men are the victims of violence at about the same rate as other females.
And by statistically, I mean that per capita, trans women commit roughly the same amount of violence/are subjected to violence at the same rate as other men, while trans men commit roughly the same amount of violence/are subjected to violence at the same rate as other women. Violence against trans women/men and trans men/women will increase or decrease proportionately based on other factors such as race, sexuality, class and access to resources, but there is never a case where women/trans men are privileged over men/trans women for their gender. There is never a case where trans women will experience or commit different rates of violence than men of the same race, sexuality and class. There is never a case where trans men will experience or commit different rates of violence than women of the same race, sexuality and class. In most cases, being visibly gender nonconforming- not an invisible “gender identitity” was the cause of hate crimes against trans identified people. It’s important to recognize that according to trans politics, gender nonconformity does not mean that one is trans. A GNC person could be considered “cisgender”- so what does that mean for stats on violence against trans people? I’m inclined to say that most trans hate crimes are actually misogynist and homophobic hate crimes. But I digress.
Let’s isolate and compare statistics only within trans identified people. Trans men are still more likely than trans women to be the victims of a violent crime- in fact, according to that study, trans men, female nonbinary people and “cis” women are all more likely to be assaulted than trans women or male nonbinary people (i.e., “transfemmes”). Unfortunately there have not been any studies on trans intracommunal violence which explicitly names both the perpetrator and the victim; however, simply going off of aforementioned statistics with regards to trans women’s rate of violence versus trans men’s, I would venture to say that trans women are more likely to commit violence against trans men (rather than vice versa). Even isolated within trans spaces, trans women follow male patterns of violence while trans men experience female patterns of victimization. The reality of this is obscured through studies that either conflate the experiences of trans women and trans men, or that neglect to inspect patterns of violence between the two.
I have tried to be as clear and concise in all of this thus far, because no one told me these things when I was trans identified. I wish someone had. None of this is hate speech. None of this is cherry picking. These are the statistics that have been backed up time and again. I have not misgendered anyone- however, I would pose a question at the end of all of this that some would consider hateful. If trans men, female nonbinary people and women share an axis of oppression- being female- then wouldn’t it be more helpful to articulate our experiences in common terms? Not in dehumanizing or inaccessible jargon (i.e., “people with cervixes”), not in terms that strip us of our ability to name our own bodies (“frontal holes”), but as women. Women who experience the material reality of our biology in vastly different ways, women who have varied and unique feelings toward our bodies and how we are treated for them, women who dress and act in myriad of ways. Women who are women, not because of how we feel, act, dress, or live, but because we are adult human females. I would also pose another question: is it helpful to call a male a woman who behaves like a male, is treated as a male and who oppresses women like all other males? If you hate read this whole post, I’d encourage you to really consider this before blocking me or replying with the calming mantra “Trans women are women”: who benefits from allowing men to call themselves something they are not? Who benefits from allowing men to redefine the words that describe women’s lived experiences; our reality?